From noc at lv86.uk Tue Oct 25 13:39:05 2022 From: noc at lv86.uk (noc at lv86.uk) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 21:39:05 +0800 Subject: [RouteViews-users] About Routeview's current peering policy Message-ID: Dear Route Views staff, I'm writing on behalf of Level eighty-six LTD, AS212483. We're interested in your project and want to get connected. We have contacted help at routeviews.org for peering 5 days ago, but it seems that we got no response. We also heard a rumor says Routeviews don't respond to peering request which worries us a lot, so I'm writing to ask the current peering policy of Routeviews, is this rumor true? Regards, Xu Hu From hans at nsrc.org Tue Oct 25 16:44:04 2022 From: hans at nsrc.org (Hans Kuhn) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:44:04 -0700 Subject: [RouteViews-users] About Routeview's current peering policy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7A19C23E-1336-4E28-822E-0B6A5A69B1B5@nsrc.org> On 25 Oct 2022, at 6:39, noc at lv86.uk wrote: > Dear Route Views staff, > I'm writing on behalf of Level eighty-six LTD, AS212483. We're interested in your project and want to get connected. > We have contacted help at routeviews.org for peering 5 days ago, but it seems that we got no response. We also heard a rumor says Routeviews don't respond to peering request which worries us a lot, so I'm writing to ask the current peering policy of Routeviews, is this rumor true? > Regards, > Xu Hu Dear Xu Hu, The rumors shouldn't concern you. I'm sorry we didn't reply promptly to your peering request. Let's fix that so you aren't worried anymore. I will reply to your peering request using your initial inquiry to help at routeviews.org. best, Hans